Showing posts with label Movie Madness March. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movie Madness March. Show all posts

Monday, March 30, 2015

MOVIE MADNESS: The Votes Are In!


Thank you all so much for participating in MOVIE MADNESS MARCH!  What a great month it has been, and I cannot thank you all enough for contributing, commenting, and spreading the love!  Today marks the final day of our month of movies, and with that comes the votes for the best and worst book to movie adaptations according to our readers.

I was quite surprised with the responses on this survey!  I thought that we would have a lot more duplicates that we did, but sadly we did not.  There were a couple of responses that were repeats, but for the most part, I only have a simple list of movies for you.  Without further ado, let's take a look at the results.  Those marked with an asterik are the duplicates that I have mentioned.

FAVORITE BOOK-TO-MOVIE ADAPTATIONS

Hunger Games 
Lord of the Rings* 
RED* 
Shawshank Redemption
 The Dead (a short story by James Joyce) 
The Great Santini 
The Princess Bride 
The Thin Man 
Winter's Bone

LEAST FAVORITE BOOK-TO-MOVIE ADAPTATIONS

Anna Karenina 
Eat, Pray, Love 
Eragon 
Gone with the Wind 
Percy Jackson & the Olympians* 
Queen of the Damned 
The Grapes of Wrath 
The Lovely Bones 
Troy*


Be sure to check out all the amazing contributions for MOVIE MADNESS MARCH right here.  And, thank you again for participating!

Do you have any movies that you would add to these lists?  Which post(s) were your favorite to read this month?

Friday, March 27, 2015

MOVIE MADNESS: Remains of the Day


Kai from FICTION STATE OF MIND is our guest today for Movie Madness, talking about Remains of the Day.  Please give her a warm welcome, and share your thoughts with her in the comment section below.

-----------------------

This 1993 film has been flitting around in my memory since I bought the novel by Kazuo Ishiguro in January. This year I have challenged myself to read some classic novels. I decided I was going to watch the movie again after reading the book.

This quickly became a problem as I struggled through the novel despite the beautiful writing. The Remains of the Day is a first person narrative from the perspective of English Butler Extraordinaire, Stevens. A letter from a former housekeeper sets Stevens to reminisce about his years in service to his former boss, Lord Darlington.

Stevens plans a journey to see Miss Kenton who is recently divorced and despairing about her future. It is Stevens’s intent to ask Miss Kenton to return to Darlington house and as he travels towards her his memories about their past overtake him.

Unfortunately, the novel’s use of flashbacks is really distracting and makes it difficult to follow the thread of the story.

The Movie however is Stellar! I originally rented this story years ago after seeing Emma Thompson in Sense and Sensibility. I was looking for more films of hers and discovered this one. Anthony Hopkins does a superb job as Stevens, every movement and gesture by him speaks volumes about a man that spends his life being unobtrusive.

Emma’s character, Miss Kenton brings an infusion of energy into the household. Sparks fly between the pair immediately. Steven’s is appalled by Miss Kenton’s familiarity with the staff and even himself. The two wage a very respectable war between the hallways of Darlington Hall. It soon becomes obvious to the viewer that the two have deeper feelings between them. Miss Kenton’s rash nature however leads her to try to get an emotional response from Stevens by threatening to marry and leave Darlington.

It backfires. And now the years and emotional distance between them seems to possibly be at an end. Yet life is rarely that simple and though both seemed primed to finally confess their feelings a twist of fate may leave them separated for ever.

Everything in this film is subtle yet emotional. The is one of the earliest Merchant/Ivory collaborations and it received stellar reviews. The cast is superb. I forgot Christopher Reeve was in this film. He does a great job in the small but important role of Mr. Farraday the American millionaire who saves Darlington Hall from being destroyed.

It’s everything I love about British films and it has a satisfying yet bittersweet ending. I highly suggest it to fans of British films.

Wednesday, March 25, 2015

MOVIE MADNESS: Last Day to Vote!!


REMINDER:  Today is the last day to vote!  This post was originally shared earlier this month, and we will be sharing the results next week to wrap up our month of Movie Madness.  Take a few minutes to share your favorites, or lack thereof!

------------------------

All month long, we are talking about movies with a literary spin.  As a reader, we tend to have pretty strong opinions about books that are made into movies.  We oftentimes find ourselves hesitant when the word is spread that our favorite book is being made for the big screen.  We worry that the movie won't give our book the justice that it deserves, and we are very well known in saying, "The book is always better."  When the movie finally hits the big screen, we leave that theater loving the story even more OR cursing at how ridiculous it turned out to be, complaining about the ruin.

Now, it is your turn!  Chime in with your favorite adaptation as well as your least favorite by filling out the form below.  If you cannot choose just one for either of these questions, feel free to complete the form multiple times.  We will be taking your votes until Wednesday, March 25, then compiling the data and sharing it at the end of the month.

When you are done, be sure you check out all of our latest MOVIE MADNESS guest articles.

Ready.  Set.  Go!!

Friday, March 20, 2015

MOVIE MADNESS: Libraries in the Movies!


Let us give Wesley of Library Educated a warm welcome.  She is here today to talk . . . LIBRARIES!  And, not just any libraries, but some of the best libraries featured in literary movies!  Read on, enjoy, and please share your thoughts in the comment section below.

-------------------------

Tif and I were brainstorming about ideas for this post and we agreed on a post that would talk about libraries and librarians in movies. I decided to take it a step farther. We’re going to talk about libraries and librarians that are featured in movies that are based on books! Another layer of literary fun!

“The Name of the Rose” by Umberto Eco/ The Name of the Rose directed by Jean-Jacques Annard

In the 14th century, a friar, William of Baskerville (played in the movie by Sean Connery) and his novice Adso of Melk (in the movie, a very young Christian Slater) is sent to a monastery high in the mountains of northern Italy to solve the mystery of some disturbing deaths, all members of the monastery’s famous scriptorium. The movie is filled with intrigue, lies, shady pasts and a hidden labyrinth of a library. I love this movie! It feels moody and grim, the library is mesmerizing and the setting is beautiful AND scary somehow. Also, Sean Connery, come on!

“Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire” by JK Rowling/ Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire directed by Mike Newell 

Obviously, books and the library come into play in all of the Harry Potter books, but we’re going to focus in on one: Goblet of Fire! When you need the answers about surviving underwater, who do you turn to? Books and the library of course! And Neville, with his love for all things botanical, can’t forget him. And you can’t talk about any of the Harry Potter books without talking about Hermione, the girl who was always hauling around a book and had all the answers. She would have been prime librarian material! This personally is my favorite Harry Potter movie, and not just because I find a certain Bulgarian Krumdidlyumptious!

“The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen” by Alan Moore, Kevin O’Neil and Bill Oakley/ The League of Extraordinary Gentleman directed by Stephen Norrington 

Do you have a movie, that even though you know it’s not really a good movie you love it anyway? That’s LXG for me. But how can you blame me? (There are multiple volumes of the graphic novel, so if the premise intrigues you but you don’t like the movie there’s still hope to be found in the source material!) Characters pulled from some of literature’s greatest hits are recruited to form basically a literary superhero group to fight supervillains also pulled from literature. The members of this super league meet each other in a beautiful setting, a medieval library. What makes this library so wonderful is that it actually exists! And you can visit it! It’s the library at the Strahov Monastery in Prague and it appears to be just as beautiful in real life as it is in the movie. There’s also a scene in a library in the home of the mysterious Dorian Grey… (Also another Sean Connery movie, unintended theme!)

“The Handmaid’s Tale” by Margaret Atwood/ The Handmaid’s Tale directed by Volker Schlöndorff 

To begin with, have you read this book? If you haven’t, please read this book. If I had the ability to stick one book in the hand of everyone I knew, this would probably be it.

It’s hard to even sum up in a few sentences but here it goes: The world is awful. There’s been all kinds of disasters and this incredibly scary government comes to power. Women who aren’t aristocratic (or are in some kind of way “criminal”) are forced to be handmaids. It’s their job to get pregnant by high ranking men (who are married) in a demeaning ritual once a month that also involves their wives. They get 3 chances with three different couples and if they don’t get pregnant they get sent to the colonies (not somewhere you want to go). Offred is one such handmaid. She used to be a librarian before things went to hell in a handbasket. Her situation is a little different because her assigned male sex partner is The Commander, and he takes an interest in her as a person. They sit in his library/office and play Scrabble and drink liquor (all of this a big no-no). Some of these evenings are where Offred learns more than any other handmaid usually does…

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

MOVIE MADNESS: Music in the Movies


Welcome to another day of MOVIE MADNESS MARCH!  Today, Tif from Tif Talks Books and one of the creators of Book Bloggers International is here to briefly chat about music in the (literary) movies.  She provides a few favorite songs and albums, but be sure to list your own personal favorites in the comment section below.

-------------------------

We talk about book to movie adaptations all the time.  The good ones.  The bad ones.  Even, the ugly ones.  BUT, let's take a little different approach today and look at some of our favorite books and the music that has been a result of these movies.  I'm talking some of my favorite tunes to listen to on a daily basis.

The first one that comes to mind is from a recent movie -- "The Hanging Tree" from Mockingjay, created by the amazing Suzanne Collins and in the version I prefer, sung by Jennifer Lawrence herself.  It is haunting, yet beautiful, and I could listen to it over and over again.



The second song that comes to mind is from one of my favorite book to movie adaptations -- "May It Be" performed by Enya and played during the credits of The Lord of the Rings:  The Fellowship of the Ring.  Absolutely gorgeous.



Then, there are complete albums that I like to listen to on a regular basis:  anything from the Harry Potter movies, every single album from The Lord of the Rings trilogy, and Jurassic Park to name just a few.  These are mostly instrumental and perfect for when I'm reading or writing . . . especially if I am reading the books that they are associated with!

Last, but not least, there are albums that come to mind that are a compilation of songs that many of us may already be familiar with, but become one album of complete awesome.  The most recent one I can think of is Guardians of the Galaxy.  Talk about a fun one to listen to!  Here is just a little teaser for your enjoyment.



I know that I am missing so many more songs and albums that are associated with literary movies.  Now it is your turn.  Tell me your favorites, and feel free to link to Spotify, YouTube, and more, so we all can enjoy the music!

Monday, March 16, 2015

MOVIE MADNESS: The Perks of Being a Wallflower


Please welcome Adam from Roof Beam Reader today as he discusses one of his personal favorites, The Perks of Being a Wallflower.  Don't forget to share your thoughts in the comments section below.

-------------------------

Page-to-Screen: The Perks of Being a Wallflower

The Perks of Being a Wallflower (1999) by Stephen Chbosky is probably my favorite book of all-time. It is one that has stood the test of time and many, many re-reads. It is the one I return to when I need to reconnect with books on a personal level. So, when I first heard there was going to be a film adaptation, I was both thrilled and terrified. Fortunately, there are three things that make this page-to-screen adaptation one of the best I’ve ever seen, and those are its Screenplay, its Music, and its Casting.

The Screenplay

How much talent must it take to return to a nearly perfect book and retell it, updating the setting, references, and music, ultimately turning it into a nearly perfect film? A whole lot of talent! That’s Stephen Chbosky, though. His hand in this film, from writing the screenplay to involving himself in casting, music, and editing, not to mention hand-picking the location, is probably the only way this film was ever going to work. Fortunately, Chbosky found a studio willing to give him that much creative freedom and control.

Although there are some changes in the screenplay, most of the book actually makes its way onto the screen. The slow unveiling of Charlie’s inner-demons was handled better than I could have expected. Key scenes, such as Charlie’s dance with Sam and Patrick, the characters’ obsession with Rocky Horror, the major fight scene, and Charlie’s huge “oops” moment during “Truth or Dare” are all there. Other moments that had to be there, the surprising kiss, for example, and the main characters’ liberating rides in the back of a pick-up truck are not only there, but are elevated and highlighted to their appropriate places as essential scenes. Even some of the iconic images from the book’s original cover, Charlie with his hands over his ears or eyes, show up in the film.

The Music 

Those who have read (or will read) the book will know how important music is to Charlie and to the story in general. The book just wouldn’t be the same without it. So, naturally, one of the things I was concerned about with the film adaptation was how it would address the music – both the soundtrack and the way the characters’ friendship and conversations develop around music and musicality (like the Rocky Horror Picture Show). Fortunately, Stephen Chbosky proves to be as big a music nerd as I am. He kept music at the heart of the film, and the pathos this generates between the film and the audience is brilliant, reflecting the brilliance of that same relationship between the book and the reader (this reader even made a soundtrack, many years ago, based on the music mentioned in the book).

The opening sequence in the film is set to "Could it be Another Change" by The Samples, which could not have been more wisely chosen. The song has become a personal favorite. Chbosky did incorporate a lot more contemporary music, which at first irked me, but in retrospect I see it was an astute choice. It helps modern audiences connect with a story that had been written nearly 15 years before and whose plot was heavily-steeped in the pop culture of the story’s time (early 1990s).


The Cast

Surprise, surprise. Stephen Chbosky was involved in casting for this movie, too! What a wonderful thing it must be to have so much control over your own creation. Just as Chbosky’s involvement benefited the screenplay and the music, both of which are pivotal to a successful film, in my opinion, so does his involvement in this third major element show great insight and audience-awareness. Casting Logan Lerman as Charlie was a stroke of brilliance, and I have to admit that I often take credit for this because I repeatedly tweeted about that possibility well before the movie was made, and especially after the film option had been announced. So, you’re welcome, world!

Most of the minor characters are excellent, too. Considering that this was a small budget film, it was surprising to see actors like Dylan McDermott (Charlie’s dad) and Kate Walsh (Charlie’s mom) cast. Paul Rudd also has an important role, and Joan Cusack makes a critical appearance near the end. I was initially worried by the decision to cast Ezra Miller as Patrick, Charlie’s best friend. This was the one character who truly did not seem to fit the image I had in my mind, but ultimately there was no reason to fear. I’ve since looked into a lot of Miller’s work, as he’s a fantastic actor.

There was only one slight problem, in my opinion, with the casting, and that was Emma Watson as Charlie’s love interest, Sam. I adore Emma Watson and find her nearly flawless. She did a brilliant job in this role, as far as knowing the character and bringing her to life, my one hang-up was the fact that she’s a very English girl playing a very American role, and sometimes the accent was just too difficult to ignore. I almost wish Chbosky would have adapted the screenplay just enough to make it fine for Watson to speak in her normal accent (it wouldn’t have taken much – she and her brother could have recently moved to town?). Ultimately, though, that’s a minor quibble in an otherwise exceptional, nearly-perfect film adaptation of one of the greatest books of my generation.

The Last Word 

Overall, while I still prefer the book to the film, this is one of the best film adaptations I’ve ever seen. There are adaptations I prefer to the actual books (such as The Hunger Games, for example) and there are adaptations that I think completely miss the mark (this list would be endless). There are adaptions that come close (Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings) and adaptations I wish I had never, ever seen (The Scarlet Letter).

The reason The Perks of Being a Wallflower is an almost perfect adaptation is not because it is better than the book, but because it is the book, just in a different mode. I don’t think I’ve ever watched a page-to-screen adaptation where I felt that all of the actors must have read and understood the book, and where I felt that I was experiencing the book all over again. Perks does this, and it’s such a great experience!

Friday, March 13, 2015

MOVIE MADNESS: Howl's Moving Castle


We have another great guest here today, Juli from A Universe in Words!  Read on, and then share your thoughts in the comment section below.

-------------------------

Hello everyone! My name is Juli and I usually write over at A Universe in Words. I am currently in my final year as an English Student and will be moving up to Scotland for a Masters in August! My favourite genres are Fantasy and Classics (does that count as a genre?). I am really excited to write this post for Book Bloggers International on book adaptations.

Before I started writing this post I asked around a bit. Because I study English Lit I'm surrounded by book fanatics every day, each of which has a very strong opinion about everything related to books. (Let's not even get into the paperback/Kindle debate!) I asked them what they thought was important about a book adaptation and out of all the answers two things kept coming back. A film had to stay true to the book, but also add something to it. In itself this struck me as a complete paradox that only book lovers could come up with! But then I thought about one of my own favourite adaptations and I understood what they meant. I am talking about Studio Ghibli's Howl's Moving Castle (2004), based on Diane Wynne Jones' novel of the same name.

I first got to know the novel through the film (shame on me, I know). I had been a fan of Studio Ghibli and its main director, Hayao Miyazaki, ever since watching Spirited Away (2001). I had heard from many people that Howl's Moving Castle was a great film and decided to give it a shot. 119 minutes later I was utterly in love with the story and desperate for more of it. I watched it in Japanese, I watched it in English and I told everyone about it. Maybe you can imagine my shock when someone told me there was a book. Initially I was hesitant to read the book, much in the way that most people are afraid to watch films based on their favourite books. Upon reading Jones’ book I realized Miyazaki changed quite a few aspects of the novel and, surprise surprise, I love all of them.

One of the key changes made by Miyazaki was move the reality of war to the forefront of the film. In the novel the war feels very far away, taking a backseat to Howl's conflict with the Witch of the Waste. Studio Ghibli on the other hand, has always had a very strong anti-war message, starting with the stunning Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind in 1984. Although some may argue that such big themes shouldn't be forced upon narratives that can't support it, Miyazaki found a wonderful way to incorporate the threat of war into the story. Our main characters find themselves stuck in a city during a night of bombing and Howl is forced to constantly reconsider his stance against choosing a side. The film doesn't shy away from showing how war changes people, both physically, mentally and magically, and it adds a sense of realism to the whole. Because of this added intensity the film will surprise even the most seasoned Wynne Jones-readers.

Now, you may wonder how Miyazaki would be able to preserve the essence of Jones' novel if he changes such a major part of the story. What is very clever about the film adaptation of Howl's Moving Castle is that it never forgets about its main characters. No matter what happens outside, Miyazaki always looks to the inside and there he finds Sophie, Jones' amazing main character. It is not often that a teenager-turned-eighty-year old successfully becomes the main character of a children's novel. Her self-discovery is crucial to the charm and magic of the novel and the film never once forgets that. Rather than shifting the attention to include more magic or explore Howl's past more, the film follows Sophie through everything and, as the emotional core of the movie, never abandons her. Because of this the film has a lot of heart, something that was crucial to Jones' novel. Not perfectly following every page of the novel to a T is no problem, as long as a director knows and loves the story he is adapting.

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

MOVIE MADNESS: Better Than The Book


Welcome back to Movie Madness March!!  Today, we have special guest, Akilah from The Englishist, chatting about movies that are better than the book.  Read on, and enjoy!  And, don't forget to share your thoughts in the comment section below.

-------------------------


Better Than The Book

Some people think that the book is ALWAYS better than the movie, but that’s just simply not true. There are movies out there that are better than the source material—either because they ramp up themes present in the original, streamline material, or reimagine the book in an entirely new way. Here are five that I think take what the books give them and turn out something even better.

1.  The Godfather (The Godfather by Mario Puzo)
The movie takes all the good parts of the book and leaves out all of the stuff no one cares about. I mean, does it really matter that the bridesmaid Sonny has sex with in the beginning of the movie has an extra large vagina and winds up in Las Vegas with Fredo? Of course not. (Also, yes, that’s mostly what I remember from the book.) In the movie, the focus stays on the Corleones and Michael’s transformation from war hero to don, and isn’t that all we care about, anyway?

Not to mention, everything good about the book that’s not in the movie (like Don Corleone’s backstory and, you know, how Fredo winds up in Vegas) shows up in The Godfather II (also better than the book).

2. The First Wives Club (The First Wives Club by Olivia Goldsmith)
The book is a lot more serious and a lot less fun than the awesome, awesome movie. Did I mention the movie is awesome? My mother, daughter, and I have watched it more than once. Love Goldie Hawn, love Bette Midler, love Diane Keaton. Love, love, love. The book is depressing and sad, and the movie manages to cover all the stuff the book does with humor and grace and is a wonderful testament to the power of female friendship.

3. Whip It (Derby Girl by Shauna Cross)
Honestly, there’s not a whole lot to say about the book than it serves as an outline of the movie (written by the author). Everything the book lacks–character nuance, character development, clear plotting, dialogue–the movie fills in. So my recommendation is to just skip the book entirely and see the movie instead.

4. The Wizard of Oz [1939] (The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by L. Frank Baum)
The book and the movie have so little in common that it’s almost not fair putting them on this list—well, the basic plot is the same. Dorothy does wind up in Oz and does befriend the Tin Woodsman, Scarecrow, and Lion; there are witches; and there are sparkly shoes. But that’s about it. Read the book if you want lots of beheadings and silver shoes and to learn about Midwestern hospitality in the 1900s. Watch the movie to see the stark difference between Kansas and Oz and to sing along to awesome songs.

I’m not saying the original is bad. I’m just saying there’s a really big emphasis on beheading and purposeless wandering and the movie is perfect in every way.

5. Legally Blonde (Legally Blonde by Amanda Brown) I couldn’t make it past the first chapter of this book (and the reviews on Goodreads and Amazon show that the people who did, didn’t particularly enjoy the rest of it). And while I wouldn’t count the movie as a favorite of mine, I would say the movie is far superior based on the fact that I could watch the whole thing. Plus: Elle Woods as portrayed by Reese Witherspoon. She is awesome.

Monday, March 9, 2015

MOVIE MADNESS: Good vs Bad Adaptations


All month long, we are talking about movies with a literary spin.  As a reader, we tend to have pretty strong opinions about books that are made into movies.  We oftentimes find ourselves hesitant when the word is spread that our favorite book is being made for the big screen.  We worry that the movie won't give our book the justice that it deserves, and we are very well known in saying, "The book is always better."  When the movie finally hits the big screen, we leave that theater loving the story even more OR cursing at how ridiculous it turned out to be, complaining about the ruin.

Now, it is your turn!  Chime in with your favorite adaptation as well as your least favorite by filling out the form below.  If you cannot choose just one for either of these questions, feel free to complete the form multiple times.  We will be taking your votes until Wednesday, March 25, then compiling the data and sharing it at the end of the month.

When you are done, be sure you check out all of our latest MOVIE MADNESS guest articles.

Ready.  Set.  Go!!

Friday, March 6, 2015

MOVIE MADNESS: Book to Movie Adaptations


We have a special guest here today to talk about 
book to movie adaptations, 
Rachel from Purple Owl Reviews!  
Please give her a warm welcome, 
and share your thoughts in the comment section below.

------------------------

Every bibliophile has had their heart broken by a movie adaptation of a book at least once in their life. But we have to be fair to directors and screenwriters. It’s pretty much impossible to make a movie from a book and have it be perfect. Whenever I watch a movie adaptation of a book I love, I go only with the standard of “does this make people want to read the book?” If it does, I consider it a successful adaptation.

I was introduced to the world of Hellboy through the 2004 Guillermo del Toro movie. After watching the movie I dove, head first, into the comics. Interestingly enough, there were very few things in common between the movie and the comics. An original fan of the comic books may have been justifiably upset with how little the movie had to do with the books. However, the movie was amazing at sparking an interest in the world and the comics were strong enough to stand on their own. The comics were amazing and I’ve read all of the original Hellboy books (though I need to catch up on BPRD and Hellboy in Hell) all thanks to the movie that was loosely based on the comics.

Similarly the 2011 movie "Priest" got me interested in the manga series it was based on. This time, the movie had even less to do with the original story of the manga. Had I been a reader of the series first, I may have been very angry at this movie. Instead, the movie was so interesting to me that I looked up the manga. Like the Hellboy comics, the Priest manga was brilliant on its own and I’ve read every book available at my library. This very poor movie adaptation led me to an amazing book series.

This is not to say that I haven’t been made angry by movie adaptations of books that I have loved. I nearly broke a projector in a literature class because I couldn’t stand more than a few minutes of the 2007 “Beowulf” movie. Beowulf is near and dear to my heart and it tore me up inside to see it so poorly represented. Yet, I was able to watch the 2005 adaptation, “Beowulf & Grendel” with no problem. Both movies strayed significantly from the original story, so why was one adaptation more palatable than the other? Personally I think it’s because the 2007 movie was just a bad movie overall. Even my friends who didn’t care as much about the book as I did said it was a bad movie. Meanwhile, though the 2005 adaptation is less well known, the overall acting, action, story, etc. make for a better movie.

Other times it’s understandable when a book is not able to be properly turned into a movie because the book is not easily translatable. The best, more recent, examples I can think of are the 2013 “World War Z” and the 2009 “Watchmen” movies. Theoretically, World War Z could have been adapted into a documentary, “District 9” kind of movie, but it would have been significantly easier to get everything wrong and even fewer people interested in watching it. Similarly, Watchmen had so many things going on in the comics that there was simply too much to be put into the movie and still have it make sense. So, as much as I could wish for the movies to have more of the books’ elements, they would have been less entertaining to the public and the public may have ended up less interested in reading the books.

Whenever a new movie adaptation of a book is introduced, it’s almost clichĂ© to hear bibliophiles say “Ugh. The book was SO much better!” I think we need to change this. We should be encouraging people to read the books before or after the movie by instead saying “You liked the movie? Oh man, you should read the book!” Admittedly, this may mean loaning out our books more often than we like but it is a sacrifice that will increase love for the books.

At the same time, we have to start rating movie adaptations of our favorite books on their own. Forget the books when you go watch the movies and just go for the sake of seeing a good movie. It’s difficult, yes, but you’ll get a lot more enjoyment out of it and you won’t be as tempted to destroy expensive equipment or go on really long rants. Other times it’s best to just not watch the movie, like me and the 2004 movie “Troy.”

Wednesday, March 4, 2015

MOVIE MADNESS: The Devil Wears Prada


Tamara from Traveling with T is here for our first guest piece for MOVIE MADNESS MARCH!  
Read on for her take on The Devil Wears Prada.


-------------------------

Book to Movie: The Devil Wears Prada 

I, like many of the other women in the world, read the book THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA in the months after it was released. As the saying in the book goes “the job a million girls would die for” this is the book that the women were reading. Sitting at the pool, with my oversized hat and my SPF- I noticed that many of us were reading the book. My roommate, a lover of fashion, was raving about this book.

And, so I got my own copy. And for awhile- I didn’t like it. In fact, I read the whole book and while I did begin to like it- I didn’t just LOVE it. And I never really once thought “oh this would make a good movie!”

But then, a few years go by. And I start seeing the movie trailer on my TV. And, loving Anne Hathaway- I knew I was going to see the movie. Having been some time since I read the book, I decided to give the book another try- just to refresh my mind. A second reading went much better and I was able to sink more deeply in the story- enjoying it on a re-read better than I did on the original.

The night of the movie, me, my brother and my cousin loaded up and went to the theater (the boys felt it was fair to go to the movie with me since I had taken them to all the latest Star Wars movies and they knew ice cream cones would be happening after the movie). So, we went- and from the first line- I was HOOKED. I loved this movie. Emily Blunt, Stanley Tucci provided comic relief and really made their roles stand-out. Anne Hathaway was brilliant as Andrea Sachs. And Meryl… Well she owned the role of Miranda Priestley.

After the movie was over- the boys asked, over ice-cream, if I had liked the movie. And I was “oh yes!” Then came the question: “Was it better than the book?”

Hmmm…

And the answer is “YES!”

Now hear me out- I know now that most book lovers are screaming “THE BOOK IS ALWAYS BETTER.” And while that is a sentiment that I can get behind- actually, I don’t always think so. Sometimes I think the movie and the book are equally good. Sometimes I think that the movie is better. This is one of the cases!

In the book:

Andrea’s boyfriend is a teacher. He’s a patron saint of goodness. Her best friend is an alcoholic. And very sexual. Andi loves them both- and yet, with the demands of her job, the job a million girls want, she struggles to keep up with them and the job. Pretty soon, the job is the only thing that she’s maintaining- and then she has to make a choice: Friends/family/loved ones or the job that a million girls want?

In the movie:

Andrea’s boyfriend is not a teacher. He works in the culinary scene. Her best friend is not an alcoholic who is very sexual and studies Russian Lit- she works at an art gallery. The name of the boyfriend was changed from Alex to Nate. The ending is different on so many levels- Andi quits her job, yes, but in the book- she does it because of a family situation- knowing that she needs to be home. In the movie, it’s more that she’s learned just because a million girls would kill for the job- it’s not right for her. Then the book and movie differ on how Andi and her boyfriend’s relationship continues- in the book, the break-up is final, there is no real talk of them getting back together. In the movie, there is potential for a happy ending for Andi and her boyfriend.

What I think about the changes:

Usually changes kind of bother me. But, the movie version was just so much better to me. It flowed easier. It took some of what I didn’t care for in the book out and created a story that was much easier on the eyes and can be watched over and over again.

The bottom line: This movie wins on so many levels- the cast, Stanley Tucci and his one liners, Emily Blunt and her “You eat carbs” line, and the looks that Meryl Streep would give. Plus the adorable Anne Hathaway- she makes the character of Andrea much better than the book version, IMO.

What do you think? Do you think the book is always better than the movie? What version did you like better?

Monday, March 2, 2015

Welcome to Movie Madness March!


We hope that you have enjoyed our month of February Firsts!  This month, we are switching gears and hitting March with Movie Madness.  But it is not just any movies.  All movies this month with be literary in nature, books adapted to the big screen.  And, we will have a handful of great blogger interviews scattered throughout.  

If you are interested in being featured in a blogger interview, fill out the survey here.  If you would like to contribute to Movie Madness March, we still have a number of spots available.  You can email us at bookbloggersintl (at) gmail (dot) com or you can simply complete our survey linked above with a selection of Guest Post.  We will be in contact with you.

Enjoy Movie Madness March!!