Thank you, Flo, for joining us today as our first guest post on our month's subject: The Future of Books!
The Future of Books: the POV of a print books’
lover
As a reader (and lover) of physical books, I
could feel threatened by the digital books: it is not the case. E-books belong
to changes in the society; they reflect the way most of the people are living.
I could say I don’t care since I’m not concerned, but somehow I’m concerned
therefore I care.
What troubles me more is the impact of e-books
on human beings. At least each week a studies is published on this topic and,
in general, these studies underline bad effects (on concentration, memory,
sleep, etc.) which are straight away dismissed by any user afraid of such
backlash. The problem is that when all the studies prove that the reading
experience is different with a print book and an e-book, I suppose we can rely
on them, at least a little. I’ve read few digital ARCs and I’ve noted that my
memories at the end of the ‘book’ are vague, superficial whereas I do not have
this problem with physical books (there can be exceptions of course - the
quality of the content is also a factor - but I cannot name a single exception
for digital copies). I assume if more and more people read digital books in the
future it will have consequences on them on various level and, especially, in
their way of seeing the world.
Techniques impact reading; therefore, I suppose that the
future of print books depends on what we expect from reading: A way of killing
time? A hobby among others? An experiment having an impact on our lives and
beings? Add what you want but, at the end of the day, what we are looking for
in books is the key of our choices and it includes the choice between physical
and digital.
I can’t split reading and life; I suppose
that’s why I feel concerned by these choices and, above all, by their
consequences on the society.
In November 2014, at a professional meeting on
the future of the book industry at the digital age, I’ve seen great projects of
‘illustrated e-books’ (for adults): it was fascinating and beautiful but I’m
not sure people will purchase these works to read them but rather to watch
them as tiny movies. The ‘reader’ is distracted by the special effects and may
pay a very little attention to the story.
In France, this evolution implies a lot of
debate, more on e-books than on the future of print books. These debate follow
three main axis: legal issues, the role of the different actors and the
financial impact on a whole industry. I’m not going to detail the arguments
and, anyway, nothing is still precise and clear.
What is quite specific to France is that, even
if people change, books are still considered as special objects, even by
non-readers; it’s in our culture. I will not detail our specifics because
it would be too long but they play a role in the debate. Books can’t be sold
like potatoes, outfits, you name it. Their prices are fixed by the publishers
and only a 5% discount can be applied by sellers.
Therefore, if the industry tries to find
solutions to adapt its business model, it also has to take into account our
traditions and what we don’t want to lose.
I’ll just give an example – Librarians want to
stay in contact with the users not only to give advice but also to protect them
of data collecting by third party like Over-Drive. I discovered the existence
of OD in December during an exchange on A Girl That Likes Books.
Following that, I’ve made research and, indeed, OD is not welcomed in France.
We’ve got laws on data collecting and private life and an organization is in
charge of their respect. Librarians ensure borrowers their activity stays
private and I like that. That’s a point that has always annoyed me regarding
the use of e-books; e-readers seem to collect a lot of information on your
reading habits and, even if by using the Internet, I know that my private life
is not so private, I want to keep control on what I can, even when the
information collected are trivial.
If I’m sure that print books are not outdated,
I’m not so confident about the fact that people are aware of the consequences
of their choices and behaviors. I do hope I’m wrong because otherwise, one day, we will be the
hostages of people whose interests are not literary.
According to me, the only improvement relating
to this matter is a better access to books and literature. The more people are
reading, the better the world is. But we must be mindful and this availability
should not result in less liberty and privacy.
Thank you, Flo for joining us today! Leave a comment for Flo below!
Interesting. I may be biased because of my love for physical books (and yes, I know that forests are not happy about that :/), but the thing is, when I read a text on a screen, I find it more difficult to concentrate and tend to skip a lot more...
ReplyDeleteI understand, I used to have the same problem, but I guess I've gotten used to reading digital. The other thing that helps is that my e-reader is just for that, reading, it doesn't have a browser, so I have less distractions. It also took me a while to be able to concentrate with audio books, but I've come to love them, specially when cleaning the house or commuting. Sometimes the metro is so full, that I wouldn't be able to keep a book open, but I can always listen to something :D
DeleteWhat I like about ebooks is the ability to bring lots of books on vacation without having to lug them around. I do tend to read more paper books (I don't like the notion of paper copies being called print books because ebooks are also printed, just a different format), but do read a fair amount of ebooks, especially when I am away from my local library and can't get a physical book.
ReplyDeleteThat is an excellent point! It is so practical when you want to bring a lot of reading material with you.
DeleteThanks for sharing! I have not gone to ebooks yet. I am still old school, and will probably remain that way for quite a while!
ReplyDeleteI read both e-books and print books and hope to be able to continue to do so for the rest of my life!
ReplyDelete